How were the remains of 40 individuals lost during World War II?

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the UCF ANT2511 Final Exam with quizzes covering key concepts in anthropology. Study with multiple-choice questions, each packed with hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and get ready for exam success!

The correct answer, indicating that the remains were smuggled out for "safekeeping," reflects a common practice during wartime when artifacts and remains are often hidden to protect them from destruction or desecration. Throughout history, during conflicts such as World War II, many valuable or vulnerable items, including human remains, were discreetly moved to prevent their loss due to destruction or looting.

This action often occurred in response to the chaos and danger of war, especially in regions facing advancing armies or imminent conflict. The idea of safeguarding remains would likely be motivated by both respect for the deceased and the desire to preserve historical or cultural significance.

In contrast, the other options suggest different scenarios that did not occur in this case. While air raids could destroy remains, the specific context points to them being safeguarded rather than lost to bombardment. The notion of burial in a secret location does not capture the urgency of preserving remains during an active wartime situation. As for remains being taken by invading forces, this would imply they were seized rather than intentionally hidden for protection, which does not align with historical accounts focusing on preservation efforts during times of war.